To start with, what’s art? The definition of artwork I have come up with, that appears to work great for me personally, is that whatever anybody calls artwork is an artwork. This stems from my perception that there’s not anything inherent about the artwork. Rather, I feel as calling something “artwork” is actually just a subjective manner of suggesting value–that may be aesthetic, aesthetic, financial, etc.
If we examine other types of creative action, we could observe how different forms can exist and be valid in precisely exactly the identical moment. I have created what I think about as artwork because I was a young kid, original drawings, subsequently photos, paintings, movies, etc. From the time I got to grad school, I wasn’t so enthusiastic about creating more things, and instead begun to go into a different course, which today can be called “Social Practice.”
This is kind of a confusing word as it’s so brand new and undefined. In a broad manner, I think about this as the reverse of Studio Practice–creating things in isolation, to be revealed and sold at a gallery context. The majority of the art world works with this particular Studio Practice strategy. In Social Practice, there’s more of a focus on thoughts and activities than on items; it may occur out art contexts, and there’s frequently a collaborative or participatory element to the job.
In my instance, the jobs I do let me meet people I would not normally meet, traveling to places that I would not normally visit, find out about topics that I did not understand I’d be considering, and at times even help folks out in tiny ways that make me feel great. I’d like to mention that what I am after is to get an enjoyable life and performing the job I perform as a performer helps me accomplish this.
I enjoy the query “Why Can You Be Art?” A premise. The query also carries me back into my freshman year of school, where these questions such as “What is a character?” Were debated (generally late at night and after smoking a lot of marijuana).
Twenty-five decades after I’d love to believe I’m a bit more clear-headed concerning this query. Possibly the only insight I have gained is that the understanding I don’t have any idea and, second, the motives are insignificant. Based upon my mood, on any particular day, I might blame making artwork to some high-minded urge to contact other people or to know the planet or some meditative working mechanism or a want to become famous or treatment or as my spiritual discipline or to supply a feeling of command or a desire to concede management, etc.
No matter the reason, an internal compulsion exists and that I continue to honor that this inner critic. If I did not, I’d feel very horrible. I’d be a broken person. So whether trying to make artwork is selfish, the simple fact remains that I’ll do it yet. Anything beyond this announcement is speculation. I’d be fearful that by exactly why I make artwork would be creating my own propaganda.
And I believe I am merely one of those men and women who had the guts to remain together with my mutual identity. Hip hop keeps me myself, keeps me personally, human.
Hip hop is the reverse of technologies. Hip hop is exactly what your body will do: Mixing, DJing, graffiti writing. The body breakdances, you cannot take away that. DJing isn’t technology; it has human intellect over tech: cutting, blending, scratching. It is physical. The exploitation of technologies is what people do, that is art.
Or simply take graffiti writing. They won’t write in a newspaper since they’ll later be more socialized to perform they will write about the walls. They are just enjoying. That is human. Graffiti reminds you of your humanity whenever you scrawl your own self-expression about the wall. Hip hop helps to find things in the entire world in fresh ways.
It will not permit you to develop too quickly.